Summary: Death Penalty
Instructions:
Read this article, Alabama pauses executions after a third failed lethal injection attempt, and provide a summary of it.
Summary
The
article discusses the pause in execution dates for the inmates and requests for
the review of the capital punishment state of the state because of various
associated challenges. Based on the information from the Alabama Governor's
office, Ivy (the governor) requested Steve Marshall (the attorney general) to
stop motions for requesting dates for execution for two convicts (The
Associated Press, 2022). The statement indicated that the governor implored the
Department of Corrections to conduct a comprehensive review of the execution
process of the State (The Associated Press, 2022). Furthermore, Ivy appealed to Marshal to halt organizing for any execution dates until the review
process is complete.
The
decision for Ivy to request the review of the state's capital punishment was
triggered by the uncompleted execution of one inmate (Kenneth Eugene Smith). According
to Ivy, law enforcement and prison officials are not responsible for the
problems related to the failure of the state to put inmates to death (The
Associated Press, 2022). Instead, criminal hijacking and legal tactics are
responsible for these challenges (The Associated Press, 2022). Ivy is
interested in a fair process that ensures justice for the victims and their
families.
Fortunately,
John Hamm (Corrections Commissioner) stated that his department is committed to
the review process and that it would be done right. He added that everything
had been set for their legal strategy for addressing last-minute appeals, which
prepares the department for the activities on the execution day. Since 2017, no State has stopped the execution process except Alabama, which prevented the
execution process when Ohio stopped the lethal injection of Alva Campbell
because employees failed to find the veins (The Associated Press, 2022).
Robert
Dunham (Death Penalty Information Center's CEO) concurred with Ivy's
statements. However, he suggested the review should be conducted by an outside
body, not the state (The Associated Press, 2022). Dunham believed that the
Department of Corrections had a bad history of defending its execution
failures. As a result, the department could not conduct a comprehensive and
fair review process of capital punishment in the state.
Generally,
there are problems associated with capital punishment in the state. As a
result, the review process is crucial to ensure all victims get justice.
Furthermore, botched executions negatively affect the men on a gurney and their
friends and families, prison workers, attorneys, and ministers. Again, this
justifies the need for the review process.
The Connection of the Article with
the Class
The
article focuses on capital punishment (death penalty), a contentious matter in
public policy and criminology. For this reason, the article links to class
content (criminology) from the perspective of the United States. As a result,
some countries have abolished capital punishment. However, the United States is
still practicing, but the process is marred with various problems, which deny
victims justice and affect people associated with the case. Hence, this
calls for a compressive review of the execution of the process of capital
punishment in the state.
Question
According
to the article, is the review of the execution process necessary? If it is
timely, should the Department of Corrections be involved in conducting it or an
external organization?
Reference
The
Associated Press. (2022, November 8). Alabama
Pauses Executions after Third Failed Lethal Injection Attempt. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/alabama-pauses-executions-third-failed-lethal-injection-attempt-rcna58304
Comments
Post a Comment